Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Israel, US, Germany and Zioconned allies seek "Exodus" of support for Palestine independence....


Israel, US, Germany and Zioconned allies seek "Exodus" of support for Palestine independence....

June 28, 2011 -- Israel's global propaganda blitzkrieg against Palestine statehood knows no bounds....

Vanuatu's prime minister is a "Survivor" of Israeli-American diplomatic and intelligence intrigue...


Israel has pulled out all the stops in its worldwide campaign to prevent further diplomatic recognition of Palestinian statehood and independence, as well as ensure that the UN General Assembly vote on Palestine's independence, scheduled for September, is not a landslide for Palestine. Israeli officials have expressed an interest in keeping the pro-Palestine vote below the two-thirds majority needed for passage of a "Uniting for Peace" resolution in the General Assembly that could overshadow an expected U.S. veto of support for Palestine independence in the Security Council.

At the very least, Israel is trying to ensure that at least 30 nations vote "no" on the Palestine independence resolution in the General Assembly. Israeli diplomats are traveling the world to pressure governments of large and small nations to vote "no" or abstain on Palestine independence. Similarly, foreign ambassadors in Tel Aviv and visiting leaders in Jerusalem are having their arms twisted to veto Palestine's bid for statehood.

Also being enlisted by Israel are its sizable assets in the news media and entertainment industry. This past weekend saw multiple airings of the movie "Exodus" on WETA-TV, the Public Broadcasting System station in Washington, DC. The showing of "Exodus" was intended to generate sympathy for Israel, just as its premier in 1960 was designed by its Zionist backers to increase support for Israel from a largely neutral American public. In 1956, President Eisenhower actually pressured Israel and its British and French allies to withdraw from the Suez Canal and Sinai, a move that split NATO and infuriated Zionists in the United States. Eleanor Roosevelt was enlisted as a supporter for the Israeli cause from the inception of the State of Israel in 1947 but it was a steady stream of propaganda, such as "Exodus," that began to see Americans slant to the Israeli cause. "Exodus," based on the novel by Leon Uris, was directed by Otto Preminger, with the screenplay being written by Dalton Trumbo. The film was pushed by United Artist's production chief, Arnold Picker, later the chair of the National Center for Jewish Film, and public relations guru Edward Gottlieb.

The "Exodus, formerly a Chesapeake Bay ferry called the "President Wakefield," was sold by American Zionist supporters of Israel in violation of a U.S. military embargo against the belligerents fighting in Palestine. The ferry had been bought through the auspices of the New York-based Sonneborn Institute, run by Zionist millionaire Rudolf G. Sonneborn. The ship set sail from France bound for Palestine on July 11, 1947, with 4515 passengers. After being rammed and boarded by British naval personnel, the vessel was towed to Haifa. Most of the passengers were deported to Germany.

In the Hollywood version, Paul Newman, who plays Haganah underground soldier Ari Ben Canaan, whose father is involved in the terrorist bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, is discussing with Eva Marie Saint, playing American Kitty Fremont, what the Israelis would do if the "Exodus" were boarded and what he describes is a full-blown false flag attack, with the intent of killing Jews, that would be the basis for generating worldwide sympathy for people who were up against the British Empire and "brutal" Arab thugs who had been allied with the German Nazis.

The following in the salient part of the script from "Exodus":

Saint: Either you compromise, or you lose.
Newman: We won't lose.
If the British give in and let us go, we've won.
And if we starve to death aboard this ship, we've still won.
Saint: They'll wait.
They'll wait until you're too weak and then come aboard and take you off.
Newman: It doesn't take much strength to set off 200 pounds of dynamite.
Saint: You'd still set it off, knowing you've lost?
Newman: Of course.
Saint: Without any regard for the lives you'd be destroying?
Newman: With every regard in the world for them.
Saint: I don't understand.
Newman: Each person on board this ship is a soldier.
The only weapon we have to fight with is our willingness to die.
Saint: But for what purpose?
Newman:
Call it publicity.
Saint:-Publicity?
Newman: -Yes, publicity.
A stunt to attract attention.
A letter to the newspapers.
A help-wanted ad to the official journal of the United Nations.
"Wanted by 600 men, women and children, a country...
"...a native land, a home."
That's all they're dying for.
Just to call attention to Israel...
...without ever having seen it themselves.
Saint: Does the vulgarity of it shock you?
You can't fight the whole British Empire with 600 people.
It isn't possible.
Newman: How many Minutemen did you have at Concord when they fired...
...the "shot heard round the world"?
Saint: -I don't know. - .
Newman: 77
Saint: Look, please understand me.
I wish you could win.
I wish it were possible for you to have a country of your own.
But it isn't.
You're offering the lives of all these people
for something that can never happen.
I know. I've been in Palestine.
Newman: -When were you there?
Saint: -A year ago.
Mr. Ben Canaan, even if you get a partition and a free Jewish state...
...the Arabs won't let you keep it.
500,000 Jews against 50 million Arabs?
You can't win.


The other major reason for the full-court press of "Exodus" is the scene of the UN General Assembly vote on the 1947 resolution that partitioned Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. This is the basis for the Palestinian declaration of statehood. However, there is no mention of the word "Palestinian" in the film, only "Arab." Those Zionists who argue that it was the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan that was the Arab state created by the UN partition do so to falsely convey the notion that Arab Palestinians have no right to the part of Palestine UN-mandated territory: east Jerusalem and Gaza and, eventually, the West Bank after 1967, that was reserved for the nascent Arab state by the UN.

The following is the script from Exodus where Jews in Palestine are following the partition vote on the radio:

Norway votes...
...for partition.
Pakistan...
...against.
Cast member:
-Who cares?
Cast member: -How is it now?
20 for Partition, 8 against, and 8 abstaining.
If we get over the next 4 I think we're in.
Republic of Panama...
...for.
The Republic of Paraguay...
...votes...
...for partition.
The Republic of Peru...
...for.
The Philippines Republic votes...
...for.
We've got two-thirds. I'm going to announce it!
Cast member: -But we haven't got the final vote yet.
Cast member: -What's the difference? We won!
The Polish People's Republic votes...
...for . . .
"The final vote of the United Nations on
the question of the partition of Palestine...
"...into an independent Jewish state and an independent Arab state...
"...is as follows:
" for...33"
... 13 against, 2 abstentions."


The re-airing of the Zionist propaganda film "Exodus" is, once again, a clear attempt to confuse and propagandize the American public. It is a scheme being played out by Israel and its agents of influence around the world.

The Israelis are concentrating on nations that voted for the 1947 partition to now vote against the establishment of the Palestinian state. The United States and Canada are in Israel's pocket and the Obama administration is fully backing Israel against Palestinian statehood, with the two Zionist State Department spokespersons, Victoria Nuland, who is married to arch-neoconservative war-hawk Robert Kagan, and Mark Toner, echoing the Israeli line one hundred percent. Joining The Hillary Clinton State Department in pressuring the UN and its member states into supporting Israel is Representative Steve Chabot (R-OH), who has called for the U.S. to withhold funding for the UN if it votes to approve Palestinian statehood.

Other UN members that voted for the 1947 partition being pressed hard by Israel to vote no on Palestine are Australia; Belgium; Brazil; Costa Rica; the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the successor states of Czechoslovakia, which voted for partition; Denmark; Dominican Republic; France; Guatemala; Haiti, Iceland; Liberia; Luxembourg; Netherlands; New Zealand; Norway; Panama; Paraguay; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Sweden; Ukraine, the successor to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic; South Africa; Uruguay; Russia, the successor to the USSR.

It is unlikely that Belarus, the successor to the Byelorussian SSR; Venezuela; Bolivia; or Ecuador, all of which voted for the 1947 partition, will vote with Israel against Palestine.

Those nations that voted against the 1947 partition: Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, and Yemen can be expected to vote for Palestine.

The nations that abstained in 1947 are Argentina, Chile, China, Colombia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, and the United Kingdom, along with now-defunct Yugoslavia, are of special interest for Israeli diplomats. China has indicated it will vote for Palestine but Colombia will support Israel. Israel's ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, stated that Mexico will vote with Israel. In an interview Israel's "Globes," Prosor said: "We are not giving up on any country. We are currently mapping out the various countries. We are deciding which to approach, and how to approach them. There are 192 member nations in the UN. We are not giving up on Latin American countries, the Caribbean, or countries along the Pacific Ocean coastline and Asia."
The one nation that was absent in 1947, Siam, now Thailand, is also subject to intense Israeli pressure to vote no on Palestine.

In Part 2, Israel's diplomatic and intelligence machinations, particularly in what Prosor referred to as "the Pacific coastline," will be revealed.....
Vanuatu's prime minister is a "Survivor" of Israeli-American diplomatic and intelligence intrigue....
June 29, 2011 -- Israel using "super-power" clout to scare up UN votes against Palestine independence...


Israel is using the kind of diplomatic clout usually exercised by a super-power in pressuring the nations of the world to vote "no" or abstain on an expected UN General Assembly resolution recognizing the independence of Palestine within 1967 borders. However, Israel does have the full backing of the United States and Germany, which are using their own diplomatic muscle to reward and threaten those nations based on their votes in the UN. Israel, through its lobbying arms, particularly the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the American Jewish Committee, has managed to get key Republicans in the House of Representatives to threaten to limit U.S. funding for the UN and its specialized agencies if the General Assembly votes to recognize Palestine.

The German government of Chancellor Angela Merkel is reportedly threatening a cut-off in economic aid to developing nations that vote for Palestine. German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle and International Aid Minister Dirk Niebel have been at the forefront of the pressure operations.

Israel's new ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, has been twisting the arms of delegates from large and small countries to vote with Israel and against Palestine. Prosor's replacement as the ambassador in London, Daniel Taub, was chosen for the job because he and his wife Zehava were both born in London and educated in the UK before emigrating to Israel. The Taubs are well-connected to Britain's Jewish community, including Labor Opposition Leader Ed Miliband, and can use their influence to try and dissuade the Tory-Liberal Democratic coalition government from voting for Palestine at the UN.

Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon has been making his rounds to suppress the pro-Palestine vote in the UN. Even the Vatican City micro-state has not been ignored by Israel. Although only a UN observer, the Vatican has diplomatic clout with majority Catholic countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as nations in Africa with sizable Catholic populations. Ayalon met with Vatican
Under-Secretary for Relations with States Monsignor Ettore Balestrero at the Vatican a few weeks ago to discuss various "political issues."

A few days after returning to Jerusalem from Europe, Ayalon requested
Vietnam to vote no on Palestine. Ayalon had been meeting with Vietnamese Minister of Information and Communications Le Doan Ho.
Earlier in June, Ayalon traveled to El Salvador to address the summit of the Organization of American States where he held bilateral discussions with several delegates to lobby for a no vote on Palestine. Ayalon's trip was designed to convince those Western Hemisphere nations that had previously recognized Palestine to abstain or vote against Palestine in the General Assembly. Mexico was a key target of the Israeli arm-twisting and Prosor later stated in New York that Israel had bagged Mexico's vote.

The former Soviet states of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan have been lobbied by Israeli President Shimon Peres who paid visits to both nations in 2009.

Ayalon later claimed success in stemming the tide of Palestinian support in Latin America and Europe.

Israel's rabidly anti-Arab racist Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, has sent classified cables to Israel's ambassadors around the world instructing them to seek promises from nations to vote against Palestine by stressing that a yes vote for Palestine would somehow "de-legitimize" Israel. Lieberman has visited Albania, Croatia, and Austria soliciting no votes on Palestine. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will visit Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Poland to persuade them to also vote no on Palestine.

Israel's strategy is to see 60 members of the UN vote no or abstain on the Palestine vote. At they very least, Israel wants some members to be absent on the day of the vote.

Prosor has stated that one of Israel's main targets in its campaign are "countries along the Pacific Ocean coastline." That strategy was part of the reason Israeli Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin visited the south Pacific island nation of Tonga in April.

Three former U.S. Trust Territories that vote with the United States and Israel in a manner reminiscent of the lockstep support that the former Byelorussian and Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republics gave to the USSR in the United Nations are expected to vote against Palestine. In May, Stuart Beck, the UN ambassador of Palau, one of these " freely Associated States," which are bound to the U.S. by treaty, said, "Palau is the number one friend of the US, ahead of everyone, including Israel. We overtook Israel this year." Palau's voting record with the United States in the UN is 96.5 percent. Palau is followed by the Federated States of Micronesia at 94 percent, Israel at 91.8 percent and the Republic of the Marshall Islands at 81 percent. The United States, Israel, and the three "associated states" often vote as a unified small minority block against a vast majority of the UN member states.

Vanuatu: A case of just how far Israel and its allies are willing to go...

The South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu is best known to Americans as the scene of one of the "Survivor" television shows. However, its history of diplomatic poker playing between China and Taiwan has made it well-known as a nation that can be swayed easily on the global stage.

In May, when Vanuatu decided to recognize the Georgian breakaway region of Abkhazia as independent, joining Russia, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Vanuatu's South Pacific partner Nauru, alarm bells went off not only in Georgia but in Israel, a close ally of Georgia. A number of dual Georgian-Israeli citizens have served or are serving as members of the Geor
gian government of President Mikhail Saakashvili and Israel counts Georgia as a major diplomatic ally at the UN.

Almost immediately after the Vanuatu government of Prime Minister Sato Kilman recognized Abkhazia, Vanuatu's ambassador to the UN, Donald Kalpokas, stated that Vanuatu recognized only Georgia and not Abkhazia. It is quite clear that Kalpokas was taking his orders not from his own government but from the US and Israeli ambassadors, Susan Rice and Prosor, both ardent supporters of Georgia. However, Vanuatu Foreign Minister Alfred Carlot, who had been on a visit to China, confirmed that Vanuatu had, in fact, recognized Abkhazia and appeared on a YouTube video confirming the recognition.

Meanwhile, New Zealand's conservative and pro-Israeli Prime Minister John Key, made some comments about Russian influence in the South Pacific at the same time his Foreign Minister Murray McCully was touring the island states on a mission tied to continued New Zealand economic assistance, a mission that may have been in concert with Germany's threat to withhold aid to nations that voted with Palestine at the UN. McCully's mission took him to Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands, with Papua New Guinea being dropped at the last minute after its foreign minister was fired.

After Abkhazian authorities produced the document signed by the prime ministers of Abkhazia and Vanuatu establishing diplomatic relations, a funny thing happened to Vanuatu Prime Minister Kilman. The nation's Supreme Court fired Kilman and appointed his predecessor Edward Natapei, dismissed in December 2010 after he lost a no-confidence vote. The court ruled that Kilman's election as prime minister was null and void because the parliamentary vote was by a show of hands rather than a secret ballot.

One of Natapei's first actions was to nullify Vanuatu's recognition of Abkhazia. But there is yet another wrinkle to the ouster of Kilman. Natapei's acting foreign minister Joe Natuman, in "de-recognizing" Abkhazia, also announced that Australian attorney Ari Jenshel, an official with the Australian Agency for International Development (AUSAID), as rife with Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO) agents as the US Agency for International Development (USAID) is with CIA agents, would be welcomed back to Vanuatu after his expulsion by the Kilman government for espionage. Natapei charged that Kilman's government was receiving "bribes" from businessmen from unnamed foreign countries. Jenshel, who is close to Australian Jewish circles, worked for five years in the Vanuatu Attorney General's office under an AUSAID program.

From the Kilman government's vantage point, Jenshel was in a position to rifle through documents and other sensitive material, copy them, and send them to Canberra. The Vanuatu government, in fact, charged Jenshel with copying sensitive documents and sending them to Australia. Jenshel was also accused of copying classified communications between the Kilman government and that of Fiji's military ruler, Commodore Frank Bainimarama. Fiji's vote on Palestine at the UN and its possible following Vanuatu in recognizing Abkhazia may have been the subject of the classified communications, which would have been of interest to ASIO, Mossad, and the CIA.

After his dismissal by the Supreme Court, Kilman was re-elected by the Vanuatu parliament with 29 out of 52 votes, defeating rival Serge Vohor by six votes. Kilman's entire government, including Foreign Minister Carlot, who arranged for the recognition of Abkhazia, was re-instated. There is no indication that the Kilman government will abide by the "de-recognition" decision of interim Prime Minister Natapei and with more evidence surfacing about Australian, Israeli, and U.S. intrigue behind Vanuatu's "constitutional coup," something that Australians are painfully aware of as a result of the CIA's 1975 constitutional coup against Australian Labor Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, Vanuatu may be an example of an intelligence operation "blow back," with Kilman and his South Pacific partners voting for Palestine at the UN General Assembly as a warning to Canberra, Wellington, Tel Aviv, Tbilisi, and Washington to stay out of South Pacific affairs.

But, as is normal, the Obama administration has not gotten the message from the South Pacific. In a throwback to "gunboat diplomacy," it is dispatching the USS Cleveland (LPD-7), a Navy amphibious ship with a Marine contingent, on a "goodwill" tour of Vanuatu, Tonga, Micronesia, Timor-Leste, and Papua New Guinea as part of "Pacific Partnership 2011." The CIA's official diplomatic cover "political officers" will undoubtedly be on hand to ensure that the five nations visited by the ship are "on side" for the General Assembly vote....


Saturday, June 25, 2011

America's neo-colonial potentate inspects one of his Caribbean colonies


June 21-22, 2011 -- America's neo-colonial potentate inspects one of his Caribbean colonies....

Part I of a two-part series on Obama's neo-colonialist policies toward America's colonies...

Like a pompous European monarch visiting one of his overseas territories in the "Third World," President Obama recently spent four hours in the U.S. colony of Puerto Rico. Billed as celebrating the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's visit in 1961 to Puerto Rico, as well as a chance to discuss the March report issued by the President's Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status, the visit had little to with either. In fact, Obama's chief priority was to attend a Democratic National Committee fundraiser at San Juan's Caribe Hilton Hotel where Obama pocketed $1 million for his re-election campaign.

The Kennedy angle was a cheap political stunt by the Obama team to try to attach a war-mongering, Wall Street-controlled puppet to the legacy an actual progressive president. The JFK "anniversary" visit claim, itself, was a ruse, since Kennedy visited Puerto Rico in December 1961, not June. And Kennedy stopped off in Puerto Rico as part of an "Alliance for Progress" tour of Latin America that also took Kennedy to Venezuela and Colombia to champion America's new approach to Latin America after years of Washington treating Latin American nations as vassal states. Obama, on the other hand, does not have the "cojones" to visit Venezuela because of his applying old CIA policies toward Latin America. Obama's Latin American policy is a policy of sanctions on Cuba and Venezuela, coup-making in Honduras and Ecuador, and gross interference in the domestic affairs of every Latin American and Caribbean nation.

It is clear that Obama favors the continued status quo in Puerto Rico. His task force's report offers the island only two referendums on future status. The first is whether Puerto Rico wishes to continue its links with the United States. With two-thirds of Puerto Ricans favoring either continued commonwealth status or statehood, that would ensure the pro-independence forces would fail in round one to achieve an absolute majority. The second referendum would give Puerto Ricans the option of statehood or continued Commonwealth status. The ploy is clearly to remove independence as a serious option from the table. As Obama's motorcade drive through downtown San Juan, crowds yelled "Yanqui go home!" and "Independencia!"

Obama's policies toward Puerto Rico are no different than his polices toward other American colonies, including Obama's native Hawai'i, where Obama grew up as a "haole," a "foreigner," people who are generally despised by native Hawai'ians who see the haole as usurpers of Hawai'ian culture and lands. Obama's view of Hawai'i, Guahan (Guam), Eastern Samoa, Virgin Islands, Northern Marianas, as well as Puerto Rico, reflects a colonialist attitude that is no different from that of the "pieds-noirs" white French colonists of Algeria, the illegal Jewish settlers on the West Bank and in east Jerusalem, and the "Jonkheer" Dutch settlers of Indonesia.

Leaked State Department cables also point to the fact that the Obama administration wants to maintain the status quo regarding the political status of British colonies around the world. Priority number one is the continued presence of U.S. military and intelligence bases on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, Ascension Island in the south Atlantic, and on British Sovereign Bases on Cyprus.

Obama only favors decolonization and secession where U.S. strategic and economic interests, including oil, are at play. Therefore, while Obama will welcome South Sudan's independence on July 9, the neo-colonialist in the White House will not extend the same consideration to Puerto Rico, Guahan, Palestine, or British colonies like Bermuda or the Turks and Caicos Islands.
Obama's America: champion of colonialism.....
June 22-23, 2011 -- Obama: purveyor of Anglo-American neo-colonialism

Second in a two-part series on Obama and his neo-colonialist policies.

President Obama has been mistakenly referred to by his right-wing critics of being influenced by the anti-colonialist feelings of his Kenyan father, Barack Obama, Sr. However, Junior Obama, far from being anti-colonialist, champions neo-colonialism in his policies toward America's colonies and those that continue to be maintained by America's European NATO allies.

During his recent four-hour stop in Puerto Rico, Obama, who was in the U.S. colony long enough to bag $1 million in presidential campaign contributions from the Caribe Hilton Hotel in San Juan, made no mention of Puerto Rican governor Luis Fortuno's violent crackdown on protesting University of Puerto Rico students upset about the far right-wing governor's plans to privatize higher education in Puerto Rico. Police have beaten, maced, shot, and sexually assaulted student and worker protesters in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rican police are believed to have carried out extra-judicial killings of Afro-Puerto Ricans in racially-motivated attacks. Yet, Obama, America's first "African-American" president, failed to mention any of these atrocities to Fortuno during his four-hour stop in Puerto Rico.

Obama represents the global elites who will sell out the interests of African-American, Afro-Caribbean, and African people at the drop of a campaign donation collection plate.

Fortuno is allied with the mainland Republican Party and he favors fast-tracking Puerto Rico to statehood via a rigged referendum procedure. Obama has obliged Fortuno and those favoring continued commonwealth status by calling for a two-stage referendum, one that will certainly eliminate the proposal for full independence from the United States in the first vote on the future status of the island.

Obama, who has championed the roll-back of labor rights and civil liberties in the mainland United States, has also embarked on a policy of neo-colonialism in America's Caribbean and Pacific colonies. In addition, Obama has backed moves by America's European NATO allies, Britain, France, the Netherlands, and Denmark to re-assert colonial control over their overseas territories. The reasons are plain: oil and other natural resource reserves have been discovered near many of these territories and the U.S. wants to ensure that its military continues to have basing rights from islets in the Indian Ocean to the Caribbean and south Pacific.

While Guahan (Guam) and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas (Saipan, Rota, Tinian, and the Northern Islands) talk about re-unification and eventual independence from the United States in a Chamorro federation, Obama's Pentagon is expanding its military presence on Guam. Plans for the expansion of U.S. military installations in Guahan will destroy 10 percent of the current forest cover on the island. Also slated for destruction are over 1300 acres of habitat for recovering nearly-extinct species, including tropical birds.

Guahan's concerns never rise to the attention of the power elite in Washington. In April, the US Senate leadership of Senators Harry Reid (D-NV) and Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and 13 other senators secretly landed at Anderson Air Force Base on Guam on their way to a top-level meeting in Hong Kong. Neither Guahan Governor Eddie Calvo, a Republican, nor any member of his administration was informed of the Senate delegation visit to Guam and Calvo questioned why the 15 senators landed in secret at Anderson instead of publicly at Won Pat International Airport, near the capital of Hagatna. The snub was even more stinging just a few months after the House of Representatives delegates of Guahan and other U.S. colonies, including the District of Columbia, lost their voting rights in House committees.

The United States is also resisting efforts by Eastern Samoa, known officially by its colonial name of "American Samoa," to gain more control over its internal affairs. Washington will resist any attempt to unify Eastern Samoa with its independent neighbor, Samoa, formerly known as Western Samoa. "American Samoa" Governor Togiola Tulafono has decried the fact that the colony is subservient to the U.S. Department of the Interior and that the Secretary of the Interior appoints American Samoa's chief and associate justices. The Obama administration has decided to maintain the status quo and not allow Eastern Samoa to appoint its own top justices.

According to leaked State Department cables, the United States has also made it clear it will resist efforts by the Tokelau islands, now a dependency of New Zealand, to regain sovereignty of Swain's Island, now a dependency of "American Samoa." New Zealand told a visiting U.S. diplomat that New Zealand would not permit Tokelau's leader, Koluei O'Brien, to press for a return of Swain's Island to Tokelau. Obama, the neo-colonialist, does not seem to mind using America's might to threaten Tokelau, a small nation made up of three atolls.

Obama's Justice Department has opposed provisions in the US Senate Resolution calling for a Fifth Constitutional Convention of the US Virgin Islands. Eric Holder's Justice Department objects to provisions that call for more autonomy for the U.S. colony, once a territory of Denmark that was sold to the United States during World War I.

The Obama administration has also stood by Britain as it has imposed a neo-colonial regime in the Turks and Caicos Islands, in an area believed to hold marine oil deposits. The British government abrogated the 2006 Constitution for the islands and given the British Governor wide-reaching powers. The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and Bermuda condemned the abrogation of the Turks and Caicos Constitution and re-imposition of colonialism. The Premier of Bermuda, Ewart Brown, who has challenged Britain's attempt to roll back the self-government of Bermuda, said that if what happened to the Turks and Caicos happened in Zimbabwe, "the world and the UK government in particular would refer to the move as barbaric and characterize its government as a cruel dictatorship."

Britain has downgraded the Bermuda passport by deciding that to travel through the Schengen area of the European Union, Bermudians must possess British passports. Bermuda has also seen the arrival of FBI and Miami-Dade police officials to supplement law enforcement on the island, a further erosion of sovereignty to the Anglo-American neo-colonialists.

Britain has decided to allow UK citizens to flood into the Turks and Caicos, as well as the British Virgin Islands, to vote in local elections to ensure that pro-independence forces are marginalized. With pro-independence talk increasing in Anguilla and the Cayman Islands, as well as Turks and Caicos, Bermuda, and British Virgin Islands, Britain's Royal Navy has announced plans to maintain a permanent naval presence in its Caribbean colonies. The U.S., through its own gunboat diplomacy in the region, sees the move as complementing its own neo-colonialist policies in the Caribbean area, from Puerto Rico and Haiti to Honduras and Colombia.

In the TCI (Turks and Caicos Islands), Britain has justified its re-colonization by calling officials of the former autonomist government corrupt and being involved with drug money laundering. However, the corruption comes from New York- and Miami-based resort developers who want to turn the TCI into a tourist colony, with the revenue going to the pockets of the wealthy land developers in the United States, many of whom are contributors to Obama, the "savior of Goldman Sachs" and the other big Wall Street firms.

According to a 2009 leaked State Department cable from the US Embassy in London, the Obama administration's first priority when it comes to Britain's dependent territories is military bases. The Obama administration wants to see nothing affect the status of three bases where the U.S. maintains strategic and intelligence assets: Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory; Wideawake Airfield on Ascension Island, part of St. Helena; and the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia on Cyprus. The U.S. has backed the UK on the rights of the former residents of Diego Garcia, the Chagossians, to return to their homeland from exile in Mauritius. Mauritius also claims Diego Garcia.

The Netherlands has cleverly disestablished the self-governing Netherlands Antilles to replace it with three islands directly absorbed into the Netherlands, Saba, Bonaire, and St. Eustatius, while granting phony "autonomy" to Sint Maarten and Curacao. Sint Maarten's Deputy Prime Minister Theo Heyliger has called the situation "modern day slavery."

Another retrogressive NATO colonial power, Denmark, has followed the Obama's orders by refusing to give Greenland Prime Minister Kuupik Kleist any information on the CIA's use of Greenland airspace for its rendition and torture program. In fact, leaked State Department cables showed that Greenland and Faroes airspace were used by the CIA in its kidnapping program but the Danish government has steadfastly refused to provide details to the governments of its two colonies.

His far-right critics call Obama a "Marxist-oriented anti-colonialist." For those who groomed Obama for the presidency, he is anything but anti-colonialist. In fact, Obama shows all the enthusiasm for Anglo-American colonialism as displayed by its British patron saint, Cecil Rhodes.
The Ghost of Goebbels: Historical Revisionism and World War II

Wayne MADSEN (USA) | 21.06.2011 | 07:58

An expected outgrowth of the world's steady descent into total and extreme capitalist control is the increasing tendency by some historians and their accomplices in the media to re-invent certain aspects of history.

Although the history of the Middle East and colonialism have been favorite playgrounds for the historical revisionists, it is World War II and the role played by the Soviet Union in the war that has attracted the attention of most of the alterers of history, both professional and amateur.As we recall the Nazi attack on the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the 70th anniversary of which we now remember, it is important to note that the "revisionism" of the events of that day began with chief Nazi German propagandist Joseph Goebbels and the disappearance of historical facts "down the memory hole," as George Orwell put it in 1984, is carried on to this day by Goebbels's ideological heirs who are mainly funded by the barons of Wall Street through various tax-free right-wing "think tanks" and research institutes in the West.

Although the revisionists claim that the 1939 Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact and its secret protocol to divide eastern Europe into respective German and Soviet spheres of influence somehow made Soviet leader Joseph Stalin a "partner" of Hitler, little attention is paid to secret German-British talks in 1939 that would have divided the world into German and British spheres of influence while making common cause against the Soviet Union.

Goebbels's ideological heirs would have everyone believe that Stalin and German Fuhrer Adolf Hitler were on the same ideological plane and were conniving to jointly conquer the world. This revisionist account is meant to mask the goals of the Western industrialists at the time. Many of the world's wealthiest capitalists, including the German-descent British royal family, wanted Hitler to stamp out Soviet Communism and had no problem with the Nazis' "long march East."

The pandering of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain to Hitler at the 1939 Munich Conference, which saw the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia, was seen in the eyes of many British and American industrial barons as the remnants of Czechoslovakia being safe from Soviet Russia. That same mind-set would exist as Nazi troops invaded Poland, the Baltic states, Yugoslavia, and then, the USSR, itself. Not until December 7, 1941, and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, would the western industrial barons decide it was time to support the war effort against the Axix Powers, albeit reluctantly.

Certainly, Britain was not alone in its secret campaign to align with the Nazis against the Soviet Union. U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, who enraged many capitalists and Republicans by establishing diplomatic relations with the USSR after he took office in 1933, found himself almost ousted in a coup d'etat in 1933 arranged by Wall Street robber barons intent on declaring a state of national emergency and placing Roosevelt under virtual house arrest. The plot was discovered by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler and communicated to the U.S. Congress where details of the plot remained secret until 1970. Among the chief coup plotters was Prescott Bush, the father and grandfather, respectively, of two later U.S. presidents. Prescott Bush was a chief Wall Street banker for German Nazi-owned businesses in the years leading up to and following the outbreak of World War II.

In 1936, U.S. ambassador to Berlin, William Dodd, wrote to Roosevelt to warn him that the threat posed to him in 1934 by the Wall Street-Nazi alliance remained as such two years later. Dodd wrote:

"A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime . . . A prominent executive of one of the largest corporations, told me point blank that he would be ready to take definite action to bring fascism into America if President Roosevelt continued his progressive policies. Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there. Propagandists for fascist groups try to dismiss the fascist scare."

The words of Dodd: "propagandists for fascist groups try to dismiss the fascist scare" ring true today. Wall Street of the 1930s and 1940s owned the major media outlets, including the large publishing houses, that gave notoriety to the revisionist commentators and historians of their day. The situation remains much the same today.

There is the distinct danger that soon, the historical revionists will not be content in putting Stalin and Hitler on the same level. With global media in the hands of a select few capitalists, it is forseeable that Stalin will be re-assessed as the reason Hitler had to conquer most of Europe and Hitler will be painted favorably. There are already signs that this historical revisionism is taking place among the right-wing political parties of Europe that are adopting many of the planks of the neo-Nazi movement, including the meme that Hitler had no choice to invade eastern Europe and the Soviet Union to protect the world against Bolshevism. That argument of the capitalists is nothing new but it is one, 70 years after the invasion of the USSR by the Nazis, that should have long ago been discarded into the ash bin of fascist propaganda.

Final Statement

Adopted by the International History Conference Commemorating 70th Anniversary of the Outbreak of 1941-1945 Great Patriotic War (Sevastopol, June 15-17, 2011)

We, the assembled representatives of historical research communities and civil societies of Belarus, Latvia, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine participating in the Sevastopol International History Conference commemorating 70th Anniversary of the outbreak of 1941-1945 Great Patriotic War, regard the War and our Victory as one of the most tragic and at the same time heroic pages in the common history of our nations.

We are increasingly alarmed with the current rise of revisionism of the history of World War II in the West and in several post-Soviet republics where incendiary political considerations outweigh commitment to historical accuracy.

We consider it absolutely unacceptable to draw the Great Patriotic War against fascism as a ‘fight of two totalitarian regimes’, to deny the justified and liberating nature of that war for our nations, to depict the Red Army’s liberation mission in 11 European countries as ‘Soviet occupation’.

We state that the concept ascribing ‘mutual responsibility’ for unleashing the war to ‘the Nazi and Soviet regimes’ lacks any historical and moral foundations. As historians, we are aware that the responsibility for that devastating war rests fully with the Western powers. Until now the diplomatic archives in London keep guarding the secrets of the British-German talks held in June 1939 on the division of the world into Great Britain’s and Germany’s spheres of influence, aimed to deter Soviet Union from taking part in shaping the future of Europe.

While Hitler’s military machine was destined to exterminate Soviet Union as a ‘hotbed of Bolshevism’, today the Nazism is sometimes being portrayed as a ‘natural response to the red threat’. This is an utmost lie contradicting recognized historical facts.

We claim that all civilized nations should officially outlaw any endeavors to justify fascism, Nazi criminals or collaborationists. Any revisions of the Nuremberg Tribunal outright statements condemning fascism are totally inadmissible.

The present round of revisionism is supposed to provide an ideological backing for “anti-totalitarian” appeals like the notorious OSCE Parliamentary Assembly resolution adopted on July 3, 2009calling for a trial over the Soviet Union’s allegedly ‘criminal past’. Such campaigns, provoking territorial claims against Russia and compensation demands for ‘damages caused during Soviet occupation’ trigger imminent and far-reaching dangerous consequences for the European security, still not adequately assessed by the short-sighted instigators of these campaigns and their blind contractors.

A distorted view on the meaning and the results of World War II and Russia’s Great Patriotic War would pave the way for a new division of Europe and the world with catastrophic consequences. This is why we are calling upon the academic community for a fair and unbiased research of the period of 1941-1945 in the name of historical truth and our common future. The sacrifices of millions of Russians in the defeat of Fascism and the devastation wrought in the war must not be perverted for current political narratives. Such actions only serve to cause division within Europe, and prevent the advancement of peace and unity amongst peoples.

(end)

It's important to remember that ALL SIDES were controlled by the NWO globalists, who are the real enemy. Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, FDR, and other lesser leaders were all controlled by the international bankers/NWO globalists. They are the enemy, and the entire world is about to rise-up and shake-off (intifada) the parasites of humanity who are destroying our beautiful planet. Each and every one of us must be a warrior for peace - if we do nothing then we are siding with the NWO. The most important weapon we have, besides information, is food, so plant a 'victory garden'. We will literally overgrow the NWO!




Friday, June 24, 2011

Mossad in Tandem with the most Infamous White House Murder INC, are responsible for hundreds of assassinations of innocent people in the Levant


Mossad in Tandem with the most Infamous White House Murder INC, are responsible for hundreds of assassinations of innocent people in the Levant and worldwide..., as well as nuclear scientists in Iran, Turkey, and Iraq....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/intelligence-spending-still-buried-deep-in-the-budget/2011/06/24/AGfhBTjH_blog.html



June , 2011 -- Did Mossad sabotage Russian plane?

Several Russian nuclear engineers and scientists, including the nuclear expert who designed Iran's nuclear power plant at Bushehr, were killed when a RusAir Tupolev-134 plane crashed while landing at Petrozavodsk, the capital of the north-western Russian Republic of Karelia, on June 20. The five nuclear experts, Sergei Rizhov, Gennadi Benyok, Valery Lalyn,
Nicolai Tronov, and Andrei Tropinov, were employed by Hydropress, one of the main Russian contractors at the Bushehr facility. The five had all worked at the Bushehr facility. The Russian nuclear engineers and scientists were among 45 people killed in the crash of the Russian airliner.

The Russian engineers had also been involved in nuclear power plant projects in India, China, and Bulgaria.

Israel's Mossad has been suspected in the deaths of a number of Iranian and Turkish nuclear scientists. Although Russian officials are calling the crash an "accident" caused by poor weather conditions and pilot error. There are reports that the plane caught fire and broke up before it crashed.

Last November, Iranian nuclear scientist Majid Shahriari was killed near Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran after unknown men on motorcycles placed an explosive in his car, which was detonated shortly afterward. Simultaneously, other motorcycle assailants placed a similar device on the car of nuclear expert Fereydoun Abbasi near the same university. The resulting explosion seriously injured Abbasi. In January 2010, Iranian nuclear expert Massoud Ali-Mohammadi was killed after a motorcycle bomb was detonated in front of his house.

In July 2009, Russian and Iranian nuclear experts were reportedly among those passengers killed when an IranAir Ilyushin-62M passenger plane skidded off the runway at Mashhad airport in northeast Iran.

In 2007, Iranian nuclear scientist Ardeshire Hassanpour, who worked at an Iranian nuclear facility in Isfahan, was said to have been assassinated by Mossad agents by being poisoned.


On January 28, 2008, we reported: "On November 30, 2007, there was another incident involving the nuclear community in Turkey. A AtlasAir McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 en route from Istanbul to Isparta broke up in mid-air in good weather just prior to it landing. There was no explosion and the wings, engines, and fuselage all separated neatly. All on board were killed. In fact, we learned that rescue workers were able to walk into the plane's cabin and retrieve personal belongings, including briefcases.

On board the aircraft was prominent Bosporus University nuclear scientist Engin Arik, who was to attend a nuclear conference in Isparta. She was accompanied on the flight by other Turkish nuclear scientists. Turkish TV showed soldiers with guns guarding the plane's wreckage. Isparta's Governor said the plane was not on its scheduled route and he did not understand why it crashed near the town of Keciborlu, seven miles from Isparta. Governor Semsettin Uzun said he never saw such a plane crash."

After the U.S. occupation of Iraq, hundreds of Iraqi scientists, including those working in nuclear and related disciplines, were reportedly assassinated by Mossad hit teams operating in Iraq. In some cases, the Iraqi scientists assassinated had been promised protection and safe passage to the United States by the CIA.....

US wars will all end up in humiliating defeats...

Not a single wall street scalp by the FBI after the largest transfer of wealth in history and now they create a new boogie man. Yeah right....
Nobody has ever succeeded in conquering Afghanistan. The Russians couldn't do it, not even Alexander the Great managed it. Tamerlane had some success but he just went through the place slaughtering everything in his path and leaving piles of skulls to show where he'd been.

The Taliban will end up ruling Afghanistan, at least in the south. Maybe some face saving deal will be found that allows a US puppet to continue as Mayor of Kabul. Meanwhile the heroin trade will continue across Russia and into Europe....
I would just add that "the Taliban" (category which I also used) is a Western invention or, at least, an oversimplification. ALL Afghan tribes are notorious for switching sides over and over and over again. I can easily imagine that some "Taliban" will support the US occupation if that seems expedient for the short term. Always remember that fact: Massoud was a Russian GRU collaborator. But did that really help the Russians? Nope.

The Afghans play "loyal" when that is expedient, but in the end they only care for their own, narrow, interests. Yes, the Taliban will control the South, and the Hazara and Tadjik will control the North, and all the alliances will be shifting like the sands of the Registan desert. But the end result will be the same: foreign invaders will have to leave, having achieved nothing....
That kind of patriotic feel good "nuke 'em all and turn their sandbox into a parking lot" has an important psychotherapeutic function. It makes it easier to deal with the cognitive dissonance between "we are #1" and "they kicked out butts *again*" by providing the illusion that if real, manly, military men gave the orders the mighty USA would easily prevail....
I will tell you that nuked folks do not glow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation , even when they are "enemies of the free world" .

As for Patton's quote, I would love to hear his insights into why the putatively "arrested" Arabs (Afghans are not Arabs, BTW, but nevermind) always end up winning against the "world's only superpower".

East Texas Rednecks are the laughingstock of the planet, but being ignorant of, well, "the rest of the planet" they can happily remain unaware of that.
where ever there is US there is trouble.what will happen if the ISI digs up yet more 'undeclared activity' in Pakistan after that?

Recently ISI chief demand from CIA to handover their moles list,I think most of us already known who's on the list Rahmanmalik,Haqqani,Gellani and definitely Zardari...
Yes that was no accident! the Donmeh (who arranged things thus that they were untouchable) the Zionists,who are very good at making murders look like accidents, or at making it seem they are done by others (e.g., Lockerbie ; 9-11 ; the infamous White House Murder INC, responsible for the assassination of Mr. Elie Hobeika, Hariri and many others in the Levant and worldwide....).
Even though Turkey played its part so beautifully over the Mavi Marmara incident, and Erdogan spoke so powerfully in Davos and elsewhere, I smelled a rat.....


In his book The Deutsch Devils, notable Jewish informer Barry Chamish drew attention to the findings of Rabbi Antelman in his books: To Eliminate The Opiate, vols. 1 and 2.

In The Deutsch Devils, Chamish focuses on the Jewish pseudo-messiah Sabbatai Zevi, and the continuation of Zevi’s evil ministry through the Turkish sect called the Donmeh movement ~ in the Ottoman Empire, ‘Jewish’ followers of Zevi who had converted to Islam, but secretly continued in the Jewish cabbala, became known as the Donmeh movement ~ dönme is Turkish for a “religious convert.”

That might set a few wheels spinning. Further down on the page there are more links between Cabal Jews and the Turks that exist up until this day.

http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com/2010/04/jewish-sabbateans-rule-world-for-satan_24.html


In Turkey, Donmeh ‘Jews’ officially practiced Islam but secretly followed Zevi’s cabbalism.

David Ben Gurion and Moshe Sharett and her second president Yitzchak Ben Zvi had lived and studied in Istanbul and embraced the concept “lehitatmen”, Hebrew for “to become an Ottoman”. Ben Gurion even had Ottoman citizenship.

Then there is the fact that Turkey has always ... or seemed to.... craved full acceptance as a European rather than a Middle Eastern country on the international table. For awhile it seemed they were returning to the ME, but the Jews want to tear down Iran, Syria, Libya so badly, you can bet they made Erdogan an offer he could not refuse....
Turkey is big time Freemasons since the 1900's. Only good thing about Turkey is they have good anti Israel TV shows....to hide their Zioconned tracks.....


Norman Finkelstein Exposes MEMRI As Mossad Op:


MEMRI and SITE....are A 'Propaganda Machine,' Expert Says And Why You Need To Know About Them.....

A Great Book About the Great Games
by Kevin Barrett


Walberg traces the evolution of Great Game I (pre-Russian revolution) into Great Game II (the Cold War era) and finally Great Game III (today’s US-British-Israeli war for world conquest). Unlike the functional psychopaths who dominate in Political Science departments and policy-making positions, Walberg never loses sight of the almost unimaginable depravity of the whole enterprise, and the tidal wave of human suffering in which imperialism has nearly drowned the world.

What makes Walberg’s book a real stand-out — and what probably made it unpublishable by the major corporate houses — is his honest analysis of the way the hardline Likudnik Zionists have seized power and dominated Great Game III.

The Great Games-book review by Gilad Atzmon
Eric Walberg on Post-Modern Imperialism: The Great Games


Zionism has proved to be an inherently dynamic political movement: it has never stopped evolving and reinventing itself. The history of Zionism reveals a clear success story. Within just six decades, Zionism fulfilled its initial promise and founded the ‘Jews only’ State, at the expense of the Palestinians. It achieved its initial goal with the vast support of the world’s richest nations and leading superpowers. By 1967 it had managed to mobilise the entirety of world Jewry, and had transformed Jewish elites into a fierce fist of Jewish power. By then, Zionism had also changed its course — instead of schlepping Jews to Palestine, it gathered that Israel would actually benefit if Diaspora Jews stayed exactly where they were, and mounted pressure on their respective governments. By the end of the 20th century, Israel has managed to transform the English-speaking empire into an Israeli mission force. In 2003 Britain and the USA sent their sons and daughters to destroy Iraq, the last fierce enemy of Israel in the region. And yet, at the time there was hardly any critical theory that could shed light onto the immense power of Israel and its lobbies within the Anglo-American political world. There was no political theory that would explain the Anglo-American’s suicidal decision to fight illegal wars for Israel. There was also a noticeable and substantial lack of scholarly work that could throw some light on the sudden twist within Western elites against Islam and Muslims. Being modernist, Eurocentric and secularist, the Left found it hard, or even impossible to deal with the complexity of both Islam and Jewish ideology.

Yet, unlike Marxism, or any other form of progressive thinking, Zionism has never been truly committed to any structural modernist way of thought. Zionism is primarily loyal to Jews and what it perceives as their needs.





Thursday, June 23, 2011

Sad spectacle of the crumbling US Empire....


Sad spectacle of the crumbling Zioconned US Empire....




Two truly ridiculous news items today from The Raw Story:
Abroad: The United States spends $20.2 billion annually on air conditioning for troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan — more than NASA's entire budget, NPR reported. In fact, the same amount of money that keeps soldiers cool is the amount the G-8 has committed to helping the fledgling democracies in Tunisia and Egypt.
Comment: no wonder the Afghans consider US soldiers as sissies who are much easier to fight than the Soviets.
At home: A woman has filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security over how her elderly mother was detained and searched by Transportation Security Administration officers at the Northwest Florida Regional Airport last weekend. News Herald reported that Jean Weber filed the complaint after her wheelchair-bound 95-year-old mother, who is in the final stages of her battle with leukemia, was asked to remove an adult diaper during a pat down search.

Lavish expenses for the elites and their stormtroopers, farcical rules and regulations for the plebes - these are all clear signs of the late stages of imperial degeneracy. Truly pathetic....


http://www.slate.com/id/2297383/



6.7 quake hits Japan. NICDR. The AP (the American version of the Soviet news agency TASS), repeats "Ring of Fire" and "regular" occurrence nonsense....

  • Greece being sold off to the banking shysters. The capitalist bloated swine are out to own everything and everyone....NYT is way off reporting on this story as usual....

  • Colombia demands Israel extradite Israeli mercenary. Colombia will never get Yair Klein because the Jewish state never extradites Jewish criminals who manage to escape there. It's a "chosen people" thing.

  • Egypt sentences three for spying for Israel. As with Lebanon and now Egypt, when Arab countries start investigating, they realize they are lousy with Israeli spies.... The FBI and CIA should take a hint....

  • "Whitey" Bulger arrested in Santa Monica. The FBI will have tons of egg on its face if this ever goes to trial.


  • Where is the money coming from???


  • Obama's Afghan withdrawal speech may mark the end of the U.S. counterinsurgency experiment.

    President Barack Obama's prime-time speech on his plan for withdrawing from Afghanistan left no doubt that he intends to run for reelection as the leader who ended two painful wars. Most notable was his intention to extract 10,000 soldiers this year and 23,000 more by next summer, before the height of Afghanistan's traditional summer fighting season. For some analysts, this would seem to be a large military risk, taken for purely domestic political benefit.

    Read more ....


  • Comment: Robert Haddick makes a number of valid points in this post .... especially on his analysis of the RAND Corp. report
    "Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning". Read it all.
  • There was a fascinating exchange in General David Petraeus’s Senate confirmation hearing yesterday when Senator Carl Levin, a Democrat and chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sought to outwit him after he had diplomatically expressed his disagreement (see the video above) with President Barack Obama’s pullout plan.

    At the start of his slot, Levin twice tried to put words into Petraeus’s mouth. When he summarised the Afghanistan commander’s view about President Barack Obama’s drawdown plan as feeling “comfortable implementing it and supporting it”, Petraeus politely demurred: “I would be a bit more qualified, Mr. Chairman.”

    Read more ....


    .... Petraeus’s point was a simple but powerful one. Soldiers can’t simply resign every time they disagree with an order. In Petraeus’s case, to pursue such a course in anything other than the most extreme circumstances would damage the country’s foreign policy. It would be an act of vanity.

    Not surprisingly, this exchange was absent in the American main stream media .... but widely reported in Europe.
    Comment: Sarkozy is probably right about the limited U.S. role in the Libyan war, but it is also true that present NATO forces will not be able to dislodge Gaddafi in the short term .... a situation that even the rebels in Libya are beginning to figure out, with most of their anger directed at the U.S..


  • Israeli Justice Minister Taakov Neeman likens Jewish assimilation to the Holocaust. Hey, Abe Foxman, we're waiting for your ADL official denunciation of these remarks. Oh, that's right, you just condemn Gentiles....
  • U.S. reserves right to militarily strike back after cyber-attacks. Here's a suggested target list: Microsoft headquarters, Redmond, Washington; NSA, Fort Meade, Maryland; CIA at Langley VA. Mossad headquarters, Herzliya, Israel; Cass Sunstein's office, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC.
  • Obomba will only be re-elected through massive vote fraud in cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Baltimore, Miami, Orlando, Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Ft Lauderdale, Boston, Los Angeles, and Newark...

    Slave to Israel


    Americans have to make a hard decision on what kind of country they want to have.

    by Philip Giraldi

    There were two stories last week that illustrate just how bad the situation has become in the wake of the virtual capitulation by President Barack Obama during Netanyahu’s triumphal May visit to Washington, the first time in recorded history that a small nation with less than eight million citizens has subjugated a much larger country with a population of more than 310 million.

    The issue of Israel is of critical importance to the antiwar movement, as frequenters of this website are surely aware. This is because Israel and its lobby in the United States have succeeded in so intertwining their interests with those of the United States that whenever Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sneezes four hundred congressmen say “Gesundheit!” What Israel does has consequences for every American citizen, and not only because Tel Aviv is the largest recipient of US economic and military assistance.







    Thursday, June 16, 2011

    AIPAC should be registered under FARA. The fact that it is not so registered is a mockery of American law....


    AIPAC should be registered under FARA. The fact that it is not so registered is a mockery of American law....


    "Fallout from criminal indictments of AIPAC staffers caught red-handed trafficking classified information in 2004-2005 that were quietly unwound under mysterious judicial rulings and even more DOJ acquiescence in 2009 has put AIPAC’s activities under a new spotlight. AIPAC briefly considered a media campaign to smear US law-enforcement officials but instead cut its losses by dumping Rosen. This led to Rosen’s $20 million retaliatory defamation lawsuit which opened up shocking new insights about AIPAC. In 2010, true to form, AIPAC let loose a salvo of pornography and prostitution charges — which succeed more in revealing AIPAC’s decrepit work environment than anything about its former top executive-branch lobbyist. But the secret that AIPAC is an organization that has been breaking US laws since its emergence from the AZC in 1963 is now officially "out of the bag." The list of US classified documents stolen and misused by AIPAC grew larger in 2010, even as the IRS is again asked to retroactively revoke AIPAC’s tax exemption."

    Another former insider is spilling his guts:


    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2011/06/aipac-from-the-inside-1-isolating-iran.html#ixzz1PIWiReah


    "The reason why I want to tell this story now is, we may be going down a path, helped along by the American Jewish community, and maybe even Israel, that is going to be worse even than the one we're on now - some sort of military confrontation with Iran. That worries me. Because they will be able to blame [it] on the Jews, to a great extent," says Weismann, who worked at AIPAC from 1993 until 2005, much of that time as the group's deputy director of foreign policy. Though Weismann disagrees sharply with those who say that AIPAC played a critical role in pushing for the 2003 U.S. decision to invade Iraq, he believes a war with Iran -- which he says "would be the stupidest thing I ever heard of" -- might well be blamed on AIPAC's leaders and their constituents . "What the Jews' war will be is Iran," he says. "Not Iraq."

    Lawrence Davidson, a history professor who I infer from the piece is himself Jewish, presents in Counterpunch today a truly grim picture of where he fears Israel may be headed demographically, and thus politically. http://bit.ly/lQxusv The very fact that such a scenario is on the radar screen within the Jewish community itself makes it essential that the USA begin at least partially decoupling the joined-at-the-hip relationship.

    So far the only Jews who are speaking up against the Zionist Israel and its appendages like AIPAC are the Ultra-Orthodox Anti-Zionist Jews. Every time that the Anti-Zionist Jews speak up, the AIPAC tentacles makes sure that they are either muffled/drowned out/made sure that there is no media coverage of their Anti-Zionist-Anti-Israel protests.

    Same thing happens on the Christian side as the Zionist Christians like Hagee/Robertson, etc. muffle out any other Christians who dare to speak out against the situation at hand.

    The AIPAC crowd also have the U.S. medias and U,S. Federal/State/Local judicial and law enforcement sewn up to ensure that the Anti-Zionist/Anti-Israel/Anti-AIPAC crowd make no traction in the courts/legal avenues.

    In short, we the U.S. are screwed, and the only part of our government with the capacity to stand up to Israel and its AIPAC appendages is DoD. Israel's government through their stoolies are working 24/7 to try and make sure that DoD's hands are tied and their complaints muffled....



    Wednesday, June 15, 2011

    CIA's covert programs in Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Pakistan relying on old tactics.....



    CIA's covert programs in Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Pakistan relying on old tactics.....

    The CIA's real Jason Bournes.... As far as the continuing global threat, the major cause of this is Israhell and its militarized colony, the USSA....


    Siamese twins CIA/MOSSAD sharing the same brain....and Washington's civilian and military spheres are increasingly conjoined, with romanticized views of war and a garrison mentality eroding the traditional system of checks and balances that curtailed military ambition and insane spending. With civilian agencies militarizing themselves, citizen-soldiers morphing into full-time warriors and embassies becoming fortresses for utter spying on a global scale, is a militaristic future of jackboots and kamikazes so far in the future?

    By exaggerating threats, defining all responses to those threats in military terms, dismissing dissenters as weak and deluded (even when they prove right), and being incapable of questioning their principles, they repeat the same mistakes again and again.....


    Until Americans turn away from militarism and learn again how to "support the constitution" more than US troops (and don't worry: those troops swear an oath to that very constitution), until they return to a broader vision of national security that deemphasizes a garrison mentality, they will continue to wound, perhaps mortally, a once great republic, before the advent of the Infamous White House Murder INC, in the Levant and worldwide with the Clean Break gang of assassins in 96.
    And that's no fairy tale, it's a fact...


    Some are saying, 'The rise of a “democratic” Muslim Brotherhood with the support of the West would mean that Syria no longer belongs to the Shiite bloc'....?
    This may have been true once but seems less likely now.....

    Iran has gained an awful lot since 2000. In Iraq it has gained a partner with the Shiites easily dominating, now that the Sunni dictatorship has ended. Iraq alone gives Iran a huge amount of strategic depth into the Middle East that it didn't have between 1979-2002.

    Hezbollah has risen to full political and military power in Lebanon. Bahrain may present Iran to get its toe in the door of the Arabian peninsula. Finally Egypt is more likely to be more independent than previously.

    But on the Syria question itself there is a lot of grays. Could be that Syria if Assad goes will still be friendly towards Iran. After all Syria is going to remain as Anti Israel as ever because that is the will of the Syrian people who want the Golan back.... Also Syrian military must know that continuing to supply weapons to Hezbollah will allow them some continuing power in Lebanon....

    Finally with Turkey I don't see it moving all that far away from Iran. In fact trade has been increasing and there is the Tabriz Ankara pipeline, Nabucco and all the wriggling about Iran on that one and the proposed Persian Pipeline which will pipe gas from the Fars gas-field in Iran over Turkey and into Europe ending in Switzerland.

    Turkey ain't gonna move away from Iran. Syria's foreign policy with regards to Israel seems popular with the people and unlikely to change. Egypt will likely be more independent. Iran has gained a lot of control within Iraq....

    The idea of Iran suffering "diplomatic isolation" is not even a threat....


    Israhell is asking for more money from the Bankrupt USSA....

    Friday, June 10, 2011

    NATO attempts to destroy incriminating evidence on Nicolas MOSSAD Sarkozy, and others..., like the US Stooge Tony Bliar...


    NATO attack on Libyan Anti-Corruption Office an attempt to destroy incriminating evidence on Nicolas MOSSAD Sarkozy, and others..., like the US Stooge Tony Bliar...

    Why does NATO wish to protect corruption? Its rebel allies are mired deep in Libyan financial fraud....

    Footage from Libyan state TV showing the results of the NATO bombing of the Libyan Anti-Corruption Agency. French President Sarkozy stood to benefit politically from the destruction of Libyan investigation files on the looting of the Libyan Sovereign Wealth Fund by Goldman Sachs.

    The NATO attack on Libya's Anti-Corruption Agency on May 17 was extremely convenient for some Western politicians who could gave faced criminal probes had the Libyan agency completed its investigation of fraud and corruption by Libyan officials, including several ministers and other Libyan government officials who defected to the rebel side.

    The Anti-Corruption Agency's files, fortunately, were backed up and are now stored in a secure location, according to Libyan officials this reporter spoke to during a recent trip to the Libyan capital.

    The Anti-Corruption Agency was, among other things, investigating how Goldman Sachs "mis-invested" $1.3 billion from the Libyan Sovereign Wealth Fund. The loss of the Libyan money was reported officially in 2008 but the investments by Goldman Sachs took place over the previous few years/ There are strong indications that some of the Libyan money was siphoned off from Goldman Sachs into the presidential campaign coffers of then-French Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, who was elected president of France in 2007. Cash payments into Sarkozy's campaign coffers was alluded to by Muammar Qaddafi's son, Seif al Islam Qaddafi, in an interview with the press. Both Colonel Qaddafi and Seif are now subject to International Criminal Court arrest warrants.

    We learned that the Libyan Anti-Corruption Agency was prioritized as a NATO target by France. Sarkozy and his friend, the French Zionist champion Bernard-Henri Levy, were early supporters of the Libyan rebel movement and France was the first nation to recognize the rebels as the government of Libya. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the rebel Interim Transitional National Council is made up of a number of ex-Libyan government officials who were subject to investigations for fraud by the Anti-Corruption Agency but were also suspected of close links with the CIA. Chief among the suspects is Mahmoud Jibril, the former Libyan Planning Minister and chief of the Economic Development Board. Jibril, who received his doctorate from the University of Pittsburgh, was under investigation by Libyan intelligence for being an agent of the CIA. Jibril now serves as the prime minister of the rebel declared "Libyan Republic."

    Jibril successfully pressed Senator John Kerry, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to unfreeze $30 billion in frozen Libyan assets held by the US Treasury Department and transfer the funds to the Libyan rebels. However, we learned in Tripoli that based on the rebels squandering $US500.5 million and Libyan Dinar 900 million in cash looted from the Libyan Central Bank in Benghazi, the U.S. Treasury Department is reluctant to allow unfrozen Libyan assets to end up in the hands of the rebel leaders, who are considered by some U.S. Treasury officials to be blatant crooks.

    Proof of the receipt of Libyan Sovereign Wealth Fund cash by Sarkozy will re-open the Clearstream scandal, in which Sarkozy was accused of receiving cash payments through a Clearstream account in Luxembourg. The money stemmed from business bribes between France and companies and government officials in Taiwan and Pakistan. Sarkozy denied the charges and tried to turn the tables by accusing his chief rival, former French Prime Minister Dominique deVillepin, of manufacturing the Clearstream evidence. Sarkozy, therefore, has every reason to press NATO to attack the Libyan Anti-Corruption Agency in order to destroy any incriminating evidence that could be used in criminal charges against Sarkozy and his campaign. Sarkozy is running for re-election as French president in 2012 and a Libyan political payola scandal would have all but sunk Sarkozy's chances for re-election and may have even landed him in prison....

     
    Copyright 2009 echkelon-Boston-Globe. Powered by Blogger
    Blogger Templates created by Deluxe Templates
    Wordpress by Wpthemescreator